New York, NY, USA
October 23,
2002
Account to Account Transfers: The New Wave in US
E-Banking
Report Published by Celent
The current lack of bank account-to-bank
account transfer (A2A) functionality represents a significant gap in the
supply of payment instruments in the US. If banks were to implement A2A,
they could generate up to US$8.5 bn in revenues.
In a new report, "Account to Account transfers:
The New Wave in US E-Banking," Celent scrutinizes the state of
account-to-account (A2A transfers in the US. Also called Interbank Fund
Transfers, A2A transfers allow consumers to move money from their bank
accounts to their accounts at other financial institutions (Me2Me) and to
other individuals’ or businesses’ bank accounts (C2C, C2B). In a
substantial (50 pages) new report supported by evidence from more than 30
in-depth interviews, Celent examines 1) the need to close the gap created
in electronic payments by the lack of A2A; 2) the business cases for A2A;
and 3) the major initiatives to implement A2A in the US.
Although
very popular across Europe and Asia, A2A transfers have almost never been
available to US consumers. However, new forces are pressuring financial
institutions to implement A2A for casual payments, bill payments, account
opening and funding, and e-commerce."It is no longer a question of
whether banks will offer A2A, but a question of how they will configure
the capability," comments Gwenn
Bézard, the
author of the report.
Among the forces pushing banks to offer A2A is the
need to reduce the volume of checks and better leverage investment in
online banking platforms. "Over the past few years, US banks have
concentrated on bill payment applications which are primarily designed to
allow consumers to pay large businesses. Meanwhile, banks have overlooked
the cost savings and revenue opportunities associated with using A2A
transfers for casual payments, bill payment, account funding, and
e-commerce," says Mr. Bézard. The lack of A2A has driven high
check volumes and limited the appeal of online banking to consumers, with
the striking consequence that the number of transactions per online
banking user is very low in the US. The total is about half that of
Norway, a country where banks allow consumers to make A2A transfers to pay
other individuals and businesses (Fig 1).
Alternative payment schemes such e-checks and Paypal
are also forcing banks to consider offering A2A. These payment mechanisms
direct no, or very limited, revenues to banks. While e-checks and Paypal
are growing annually at 96% and 90% respectively, there has been only 43%
growth for bill payments and 19% for credit cards which are typical bank
revenues drivers. In this context, banks need to develop an A2A offering
to protect their revenues in payments (Fig 2).
Celent expects 2003 to be a critical year for the US
payment industry as ACH payment networks (NACHA with Project ACTION) and
EFT networks (NYCE, Star Systems) race to support A2A transfers and enroll
institutions. Over the next 2-3 years, Celent believes that the
introduction of A2A could drive Paypal out of business while making banks’
electronic payments offerings more like the Fedex model, in which
consumers trade off between speed of delivery and cost.
A Table
of Contents is available online.
|